Seminars and conferences

Conference Innovative Incentives for Effective Antibacterials

The Presidency hosted an expert conference about the antibiotic resistance threat on 17 September in Stockholm. The aim of the conference was to explore ways of creating incentives for the development of new drugs. Such incentives could be changes in the regulatory mechanisms, innovative financial instruments or other innovative mechanisms.

Photo: Leif R Jansson/Scanpix

Professor Otto Cars, STRAMA

 The Presidency wants to send a political signal that innovative incentives are urgently needed for the development of new antibacterials. Bacteria that cannot be treated with conventional antibiotics is a growing problem, both in Sweden and elsewhere. At the same time, the level of research into and the development of new effective antibiotics is decreasing.

Access to effective antibiotics is essential for a high level of communicable disease prevention and control, good health care and for health activities in the developing world. Without access to effective antibiotics, common diseases such as pneumonia will again become lethal threats. Also, effective cancer treatment and the use of implants and transplants are at stake. These are methods that impact on the body's immune defence system and thus require effective antibiotics.
 
Previous Presidencies have focused on the effective use of antibiotics and the prevention and control of infections that arise and are spread within health and medical services. The Swedish Presidency is now going a step further and focusing the discussion on potential incentives for developing effective new antibiotics.
 
This expert meeting targeted an audience of EU policy-makers, executive officers and experts from the public health sector and also industry trade associations.
 
The conference was co-funded by the European Commission, and organised in cooperation with The Medical Product Agency, Swedish Institute for Infectious Disease Control, The National Board of Health and Welfare, The Swedish Strategic Programme against Antibiotic Resistance (STRAMA), Action on Antibiotic Resistance (ReAct), European Observatory on Health Systems and Policies,  European Medicines Agency (EMEA) and European Centre for Disease Prevention and Control (ECDC).

When

17 September

Where

  • Sheraton Stockholm Hotel

    Tegelbacken 6

    Sweden

Access

Invited officials only

Participants

Approx.: 150

Ministry in charge

Ministry of Health and Social Affairs

Cabinet minister

Göran Hägglund

Contacts

  • Cecilia Halle

    Deputy Director, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs

    +46 8 405 10 00

  • Maria Nilsson

    Desk Officer, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs

    +46 8 405 10 00

  • Martin Kits

    Press Secretary, Ministry of Health and Social Affairs

    +46 8 405 10 00

  • Print
  • Subscribe to updates

  • Send to colleague

  • Bookmark and Share
Decision-making process

EU legislation

  • The Council of the EU Decides
  • The European Parliament Decides
  • Coreper (Commitee of Permanent Representatives) Prepare
  • The European Parliament's committees Prepare
  • Working groups Prepare
  • The European Commisson Propose legislation
  • Conferences and other meetings Give inputs

The Council of the European Union is the EU’s highest decision-making body. It consists of one minister from each Member State who has the authority to make binding decisions for his or her government. Which minister participates from each Member State depends on the type of issue being discussed. The minister from the country holding the Presidency chairs the meetings.

The European Parliament passes new laws together with the Council, based on proposals from the Commission. The Parliament’s influence varies depending on the issues discussed. Normally, decisions are made in ‘codecision’ between the Parliament and Council which means that the Council must accept the European Parliament's amendment proposals in order to pass new legislation.

Coreper – the Committee of Permanent Representatives – prepares for Council meetings. All issues must pass through Coreper before they can be included on the agenda for a Council meeting. Coreper meets in two configurations, Coreper II and Coreper I, dealing with different subject areas. Coreper II is made up of the Permanent Representatives (the ambassadors) from the Member States, who work at the Permanent Representations in Brussels. Coreper I is made up of the Deputy Permanent Representatives (the ambassadors’ deputies).

The European Parliament’s proposals are considered in one of the parliamentary committees. There are twenty permanent committees, divided into subject areas, for example foreign affairs or the budget. The European Parliament can also appoint temporary committees for up to twelve months, with the possibility of extension. One of the committee members writes the committee’s report on a particular issue. In this function, he or she is called the rapporteur and has great influence over the way in which the report is drawn up.

Council working groups and committees are responsible for preparing all issues before they are referred to Coreper and finally to ministerial level. The working groups and committees are made up of senior officials, either from the Member States’ Permanent Representations in Brussels or from ministries in their capital cities.

The European Commission proposes new laws for the European Parliament and the Council to consider. It consists of one member from each Member State and it makes collective decisions. That means that the Commissioners support all decisions made, even those outside their respective subject area. The decisions are normally made without a vote, but if a Commissioner demands a vote, this is carried out. In these cases, absolute majority is required for a proposal to be accepted.

The European Council is also referred to as the EU summits and consists of the heads of state or government of the Member States together with the President of the Commission. They meet once or twice every six months to draw up political guidelines for the EU’s development.

The EU Presidency usually organises a number of informal ministerial meetings in the country holding the Presidency. No formal decisions are made at these meetings. The meetings instead offer an opportunity for the ministers to discuss current EU issues freely. One purpose is to provide an informal setting in which to solve problems and pave the way for decisions on difficult issues on the Council's ordinary agenda.

The EU cooperation involves striking a balance between the views of a number of parties on various levels. To assess the progress made on a certain issue and to enable the parties to put forward new proposals, conferences and different types of meetings are often arranged. No binding decisions are made at these conferences , but they still serve an important function in that they prepare the way for the formal steps in the EU's decision-making process.

The EU maintains regular dialogue with a very large number of countries and groups of countries outside the EU. These meetings with countries outside the EU are also known as ‘third country meetings’. The Presidency plans, coordinates and chairs the meetings. During the Swedish Presidency, around 280 such meetings will take place, some in Sweden and some in Brussels, New York and other countries outside the EU.